Leland's Seven Stewardship Principles — Church Stewardship Program

A partnership with Leland Rubin, creator of the Seven Stewardship Principles, and Allan Bell - CPA, CMA, MBA, Nsites founder and creator

S6 Provide for Your Pastors' Wellbeing · Lesson 3 of 4

Lesson 3 — Benefits, Retirement and Risk Protection for Pastoral Families

Review and document benefits, retirement contribution structure and family risk-protection adequacy, referring the pastoral family to qualified professionals where gaps are found.

Not started

Seven Principles curriculum version 1.0 — author-review draft pending Leland Rubin's approval prior to publication. · Leland's Seven Stewardship Principles methodology, content, exercises and deliverables are created by Leland Rubin and remain in author-review draft pending his approval.

Where this lesson sits

Curriculum version 1.0 · Author Review

Module purpose: Establish that caring well for the pastor's household is a governance responsibility, document a fair and benchmarked compensation framework, review benefits, retirement and risk protection, and adopt a written rest-and-renewal policy that protects longevity in ministry.

Official outcome: Pastoral Wellbeing and Compensation Plan

This lesson produces: Benefits, Retirement and Risk-Protection Review Checklist

Anything you type is kept in this browser session only. This prototype does not save to a server.

Learn

Participant study reading — approximately 90 minutes of learning and shared work.

Learning objective: Review and document benefits, retirement contribution structure and family risk-protection adequacy, referring the pastoral family to qualified professionals where gaps are found.

Recommended participants: Personnel or compensation committee, treasurer, and, for the risk-protection portion, the pastor if willing to participate at the policy level

Estimated teaching time: 90 minutes

Success indicators

  • • A documented benefits inventory exists covering health coverage, retirement contribution and any additional allowances
  • • The retirement contribution structure has been benchmarked against comparable-role practice
  • • A risk-protection review has been completed covering life, disability, health and liability coverage adequacy
  • • Any coverage gap identified has resulted in a referral to a qualified, licensed professional chosen by the pastoral family

Materials and evidence you will use

  • • Current benefits and retirement plan documentation
  • • Comparable-role benefits benchmark data
  • • General public information on life, disability, health and liability insurance categories
  • • Benchmark comparison for at least benefits and retirement categories
  • • Documented referral for any identified risk-protection gap

What you should be able to produce

  • • A documented benefits inventory exists covering health coverage, retirement contribution and any additional allowances
  • • The retirement contribution structure has been benchmarked against comparable-role practice
  • • A risk-protection review has been completed covering life, disability, health and liability coverage adequacy
  • • Any coverage gap identified has resulted in a referral to a qualified, licensed professional chosen by the pastoral family

Foundational ministry principle

Proverbs 27:12

12 A prudent man foreseeth the evil, and hideth himself; but the simple pass on, and are punished.

King James Version (KJV) · Public domain

This proverb is offered as a frame because it commends foreseeing risk and taking sensible precaution in advance, which is the exact posture this lesson asks leadership to take toward the pastoral family's risk protection.

As a draft framing for discussion, the facilitator might suggest that a church which never checks whether its pastor's family has adequate life, disability or health coverage is functionally choosing not to foresee a foreseeable risk, and that today's review is a concrete act of prudence on the family's behalf.

Understand the concept

Your work in this lesson focuses on this outcome: Review and document benefits, retirement contribution structure and family risk-protection adequacy, referring the pastoral family to qualified professionals where gaps are found.

A documented benefits inventory, a benchmarked retirement structure, and a policy-level risk-protection review with appropriate referrals together close the provision gaps that salary alone cannot address.

Why it matters for your church

Verbal or informal benefits are vulnerable to being lost or disputed whenever pastoral or committee leadership changes.

A pastoral family without adequate disability or life coverage carries catastrophic financial risk the church could help address structurally.

Committees that attempt to give personal financial or insurance advice without qualification expose both the family and the church to poor outcomes and liability.

Examine the evidence

Use Current benefits and retirement plan documentation, Comparable-role benefits benchmark data, and General public information on life, disability, health and liability insurance categories to compare your church's present practice with its stated intentions. Look for documented patterns, missing information, and differences between what people assume and what the evidence supports.

Your completed work should be supported by Benchmark comparison for at least benefits and retirement categories, and Documented referral for any identified risk-protection gap. Record uncertainty honestly so your team knows what still needs to be verified.

Prepare for the shared exercise

Document current benefits and retirement provisions against benchmark practice, and complete a policy-level risk-protection review with referrals for any identified gap. The Benefits, Retirement and Risk-Protection Review Checklist produces the Benefits, Retirement and Risk-Protection Review Checklist, which contributes to the principle's principal deliverable.

Before working with your team, consider this reflection: If our pastor became unable to work tomorrow, would our current benefits and risk-protection structures actually protect their family, or would we be discovering the gaps for the first time in crisis?

Key terms

Benefits inventory
A documented list of all non-salary provisions a church makes for its pastor, including health coverage, retirement contribution and additional allowances.
Risk-protection review
A policy-level checklist assessing whether structures exist to protect a pastoral family against loss of income or health from death, disability or illness, without requiring personal financial disclosure.
Qualified referral
Connecting the pastoral family with a licensed, independent insurance or financial professional of their own choosing for individualized advice, rather than the church committee attempting to give that advice itself.

What this means for a church

  • • Verbal or informal benefits are vulnerable to being lost or disputed whenever pastoral or committee leadership changes
  • • A pastoral family without adequate disability or life coverage carries catastrophic financial risk the church could help address structurally
  • • Committees that attempt to give personal financial or insurance advice without qualification expose both the family and the church to poor outcomes and liability

Common failure patterns

  • • Assuming benefits are adequate because they have never been formally reviewed or complained about
  • • Delaying retirement contribution structure because it feels like a lower priority than salary, ignoring the cost of lost compounding time
  • • Committees attempting to recommend specific insurance products or investment choices instead of referring to qualified professionals

Ministry case

The Coverage No One Had Checked

Harborview Fellowship's committee discovered during its first risk-protection review that its pastor had employer-sponsored health coverage but no disability insurance of any kind, a gap that had simply never come up because no one had ever asked the question in a structured way.

Rather than attempting to select a policy themselves, the committee referred the pastoral family to two independent, licensed insurance agents for a disability-coverage quote, and separately budgeted a modest annual allowance the family could apply toward whichever coverage they chose, keeping the decision itself in the family's hands.

Lesson takeaway

A documented benefits inventory, a benchmarked retirement structure, and a policy-level risk-protection review with appropriate referrals together close the provision gaps that salary alone cannot address.

Discuss

Guided discussion for the leadership table.

With benefits, retirement and risk protection reviewed and any gaps referred appropriately, let's turn to the final lesson: building a rest and renewal policy that protects long-term ministry health.

  1. Which benefit or coverage area had never been formally reviewed before today, and why had it gone unexamined?
  2. How comfortable are we, as a committee, staying within the boundary of referral rather than giving advice ourselves?
  3. What would a modest, consistent retirement contribution structure cost us now compared to the value of decades of compounding for our pastor?
  4. How will we communicate today's review to the pastoral family in a way that feels like support rather than scrutiny?

Practice

Applied exercise — produces the Benefits, Retirement and Risk-Protection Review Checklist.

Benefits, Retirement and Risk-Protection Review Checklist

Document current benefits and retirement provisions against benchmark practice, and complete a policy-level risk-protection review with referrals for any identified gap.

Estimated time: 45 minutes

Participants: Personnel or compensation committee, treasurer, and pastor if willing to participate at the policy level

Artifact produced: Benefits, Retirement and Risk-Protection Review Checklist

Required inputs

  • • Current benefits and retirement plan documentation
  • • Comparable-role benefits benchmark data
  • • A short list of qualified, licensed professionals available for referral

Instructions

  1. List every current documented and informal benefit in the inventory column.
  2. Compare each benefit against the benchmark source and note whether it is comparable, ahead, or behind typical practice.
  3. Document the current retirement contribution structure and compare it against the benchmark.
  4. Work through the four risk-protection categories as policy-level yes, unclear, or no questions.
  5. For every unclear or no answer, record a specific referral action and target date.
  6. Confirm any budget implications of closing identified gaps and note them for the 90-day action plan.
  7. Summarize the overall benefits and risk-protection status for the module deliverable.
Complete it online

Benefits, Retirement and Risk-Protection Review Checklist

  • Church name: ______________________
  • Date of review: ______________________
  • Benchmark source used: ______________________
  • Facilitator: ______________________
Benefit or risk categoryCurrent statusBenchmark comparisonReferral or action neededTarget date
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

Worked example

A fully completed sample using a fictional church. This is illustrative teaching material, not any church's actual data.

Harborview Fellowship (illustrative example — not actual church data)

Harborview Fellowship's committee completed its first documented benefits and risk-protection review using an illustrative comparable-size benchmark.

Benefit or risk categoryCurrent statusBenchmark comparisonReferral or action neededTarget date
Health coverageEmployer-sponsored plan in placeComparable to benchmarkNone neededN/A
Retirement contributionNo structured contribution currentlyBehind benchmark, which shows typical 5% matchEstablish 3% contribution in year one, review toward benchmark in year twoIn 8 weeks
Disability insuranceUnclear — no documented coverage foundBehind benchmarkRefer pastoral family to two independent licensed agents for quotes; budget modest annual allowanceIn 4 weeks

How this leadership team reasoned

  • • Harborview's committee found health coverage adequate and roughly in line with benchmark, but discovered no structured retirement contribution and no clear disability coverage, two of the more commonly overlooked provisions.
  • • The committee chose a phased retirement contribution rather than jumping straight to the full benchmark match, given current budget constraints, while treating disability coverage as more urgent given the catastrophic risk it addresses.

Decisions recorded

  • • The committee approved a 3% retirement contribution beginning in the next budget year, with a written commitment to review toward the 5% benchmark the following year.
  • • The treasurer was assigned to provide the pastoral family with a list of two independent, licensed insurance agents and a modest annual coverage allowance within four weeks.

Completed artifact extract — Benefits, Retirement and Risk-Protection Review Checklist

Benefits and risk-protection review completed: health coverage comparable to benchmark, retirement contribution behind benchmark with a phased plan approved, and disability coverage gap identified with a referral and budget allowance approved within four weeks.

Illustrative exercise score: 18 of 20. The committee completed a thorough review, correctly stayed within a referral role rather than recommending specific products, and documented specific dated actions for both identified gaps.

BAG Index complement

Household financial-literacy layer that complements this stewardship principle.

BAG Index complement

Retirement accounts, employer contributions and compounding

A short complement introducing the BAG Index retirement literacy module, explaining how retirement accounts, employer contributions and compounding work together over time, extending this lesson's benefits and risk-protection review into long-term financial security for the pastor's family.

Teaching points

  • Compounding means investment growth earns its own growth over time, which is why starting retirement contributions earlier, even at a smaller amount, generally outperforms starting later at a larger amount
  • An employer contribution to a retirement account, sometimes called a match, is effectively additional compensation that a household forfeits entirely if it does not contribute enough to receive it
  • Retirement accounts commonly differ in their tax treatment, with some allowing contributions before tax and taxing withdrawals later, and others taxing contributions now so that qualified withdrawals later are not taxed
  • Vesting schedules determine when a pastor's household fully owns employer contributions, and leaving a position before full vesting can mean forfeiting some or all unvested employer funds
  • A pastor's household should review its retirement account statement at least annually to confirm contributions are actually being made as intended and that the account is not sitting in an unintended, overly conservative or overly aggressive default

Household practice step: The pastor's household completing the BAG Index retirement literacy module confirms it is contributing enough to receive any full employer match available, and reviews its most recent retirement account statement for accuracy.

Supports this principle: This complement extends this lesson's benefits and risk-protection review into the specific mechanics of retirement saving, helping the church confirm that any retirement benefit it offers is actually being understood and used rather than left on the table unclaimed.

This module explains general retirement-account and compounding concepts only; it does not recommend specific investment selections, funds or providers, and the pastor's household should consult a qualified, licensed investment or financial professional for individualized retirement decisions.

Score

Transparent 20-point exercise rubric: four criteria rated 0 to 5 with observable anchors.

Criterion0 — not evident3 — acceptable5 — exemplarySample
Completeness (0–5)Fewer than half of the benefits and risk-protection categories were reviewed.All categories were reviewed, but some referral or action fields were left blank for identified gaps.All benefits and risk-protection categories were reviewed with a benchmark comparison and a specific action or referral for every gap.5
Use of evidence (0–5)The review was completed without reference to any benchmark source for typical benefits practice.A benchmark source was referenced for some but not all categories.Every category was compared against a credible benchmark source for typical comparable-role practice.4
Alignment to the module purpose (0–5)The review treated benefits and risk protection as an abstract compliance exercise unrelated to actual family security.The review named gaps but did not explain the real risk each gap poses to the pastoral family.The review explicitly connected each gap to a specific real-world risk the pastoral family currently carries.5
Actionability and ownership (0–5)No referral, action, owner or date was recorded for any identified gap.Actions were named but lacked a specific owner or realistic date.Every identified gap has a specific action or referral, a named owner, and a realistic target date.5
Worked sample total19 / 20
  • Completeness: Harborview reviewed all categories and documented a specific action or referral for every gap identified.
  • Use of evidence: Most categories were compared against a benchmark; the liability coverage category was noted as not applicable without a specific benchmark source cited.
  • Alignment to the module purpose: The disability-coverage gap was explicitly connected to catastrophic income-loss risk for the family, motivating the urgency of the referral.
  • Actionability and ownership: Both identified gaps have a specific action, a named owner and a realistic target date within eight weeks.

Lesson-exercise scores (20 points each) demonstrate learning and artifact quality. They do not automatically overwrite the official Seven Principles assessment, which remains a separate 100-point rating of five dimensions for each principle.

Submit evidence

What must be submitted for this lesson to count as complete.

Submit

  • • Completed Benefits, Retirement and Risk-Protection Review Checklist with all actions and referrals recorded

Attach this evidence

  • Benchmark comparison for at least benefits and retirement categories
  • Documented referral for any identified risk-protection gap

File upload is not implemented in this prototype. Ticking a box records that the church can produce the document; it does not store a file.

Contribute to official outcome

How this lesson builds the Pastoral Wellbeing and Compensation Plan.

Artifact produced: Benefits, Retirement and Risk-Protection Review Checklist

Becomes the benefits, retirement and risk-protection sections of the Pastoral Wellbeing and Compensation Plan.

Open the module deliverable assembly

Participant reflection and notes

If our pastor became unable to work tomorrow, would our current benefits and risk-protection structures actually protect their family, or would we be discovering the gaps for the first time in crisis?